The Mathematical Universe [Book Review]

According to an old, fairly well-known joke, a clock that is stopped is better than one that loses time—say, five seconds every hour—because the stopped clock is right twice every day, whereas the slow one is right only once every year. Mike Hockney, I take it, would not find this funny at all. On the contrary, he would think it obvious that the stopped clock was better.

“The scientific method,” Hockney argues in his book The Mathematical Universe (2014), “produces successful theories; it does not produce true theories.”(650-652)[1]. And success, in the absence of truth, Hockney seems to believe is little better than no success at all:

Scientific materialism is absurdly incoherent. (653)

Scientific materialism is a joke. It’s now much closer to Berkeleyan empiricist idealism than it is to any kind of materialism.(676-677).

Scientists are living in a fantasy world if they think they will ever explain reality.(911)

Science doesn’t know what anything is. It’s just a set of measurements with labels attached.(915-916).

Scientists – wedded to empiricism rather than rationalism – have evolved beyond the Abrahamists but are still seriously retarded.(1043-1044).

All scientists are inherently irrational.(1062)

Scientists, locked into their sensory worldview…lack the imaginationand intuition to be truly intelligent. It’s up to the elite – ontological mathematicians – to put these scientific apes in their place.(1306-1308).

Science is the quasi-religious worship of sensory experience, and the rejection of rational unobservables.(1802-1803).

Science’s understanding of the fundamental ground of reality is insane.(4856).

Science is anti-rationalism. Science is as bad and deluded as the other great enemy of rationalism: religious faith.(5187-5188)

The tragedy is that science is now run by fools.(5399-5400)

To many scientists and their supporters, statements like these are sure to inflame. The successful theories of science, after all, have provided us with all of our modern technology, including medicine, communications, transportation, and so on. Hockney’s alternative view, which as we shall see is based on reason and particularly mathematics, could not by itself have given us the computers and the internet that allow him to disseminate this view. It would not have allowed us to eradicate many diseases and to extend the average lifespan of members of our species. It would not have given us rapid access to almost any place on earth, as well as allowed us to explore outer space.

Nor is science just about utility, helping us survive and prosper. It has also delivered a fairly coherent picture of our world. As E.O. Wilson described in Consilience (1998), the different areas of science—physics, chemistry, biology, behavior—fit together to describe how primordial atoms evolved into molecules; molecules evolved into cells; cells evolved into organisms; and organisms evolved behavior, including our own. The result is a history, beginning billions of years ago and culminating in modern human societies. For the most part, this story hangs together remarkably well.

So what is Hockney’s problem? He is concerned with ultimate questions, and particularly one that science not only has not yet solved, but which many thinkers, probably including some scientists, think science may never solve: how did the universe begin, i.e., how did something arise from nothing? The mainstream scientific view is that the universe came into existence with the Big Bang, about fourteen billion years ago, which created its fundamental constituents, matter, space and time.

Here is the problem with that view, according to Hockney:

What and where were the laws of physics before the physical universe came into being? What laws were controlling the Big Bang as it happened? What laws caused it in the first place? Whatever caused and controlled the Big Bang must, of necessity, have preceded the Big Bang, yet scientists openly say that space, time and matter did not exist prior to the Big Bang. In which case, there’s nothing left within the empiricist, materialist paradigm to account for how the Big Bang happened…

No scientist has ever plausibly explained where scientific laws come from, how they interact with mutable, material things and how they exist at all.(565-573).

I think this is a fair criticism. Certainly scientists themselves are aware of this problem. They are also aware of other rather embarrassing deficits if not down-right contradictions in their theories, also pointed out by Hockney, such as the paradoxes and multiple interpretations associated with quantum mechanics, the inability to reconcile this theory with other theories such as relativity into a single grand theory, the lack of any way to test the claims of some ideas such as string theory, and so on. Science is clearly an ongoing, incompleted project that features not just gaps in its knowledge, but implications that sometimes make no sense to any of us.

The question is, is there a better alternative? For example, is there a solution to the problem of something from nothing? Hockney and his fellow Illuminati, as they call themselves, think there is, and that it lies in making reason, particularly mathematics, the primary source of our knowledge, rather than sensory observations:

only mathematics delivers seamless truth since it’s based on analytic a priori truths and not on contingent, ad hoc hypotheses subjected to unreliable experimental verification.(653-654).

Human reason – within the strict context of mathematics – is always right and always superior to empiricism.(682-683).

Only mathematics allows absolute knowledge of existence to be attained. (3969-3970)

You simply cannot rely on your senses if you want definitive answers to existence. If you want answers, you must use your reason, not your senses. Mathematics is the ultimate subject of reason. It has no connection whatsoever with the senses. The whole of mathematics can be worked out without ever looking at the world.(4515-4518)

Science, to be plausible when it comes to the ultimate questions, must be based on rationalist mathematics and not on the empiricist scientific method that is incapable of addressing infallible, absolute truths.(4640-4642).

In The Mathematical Universe, Hockney lays out his case in support of this. I found this treatise creative, interesting, provocative and certainly worth the read. It definitely stimulated a lot of thinking on my part, and I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend it to scientists, philosophers and anyone else deeply interested in the fundamental questions of our existence. Nevertheless, I think it has some fairly serious flaws, which I will discuss here.

A Total Zero

According to Illuminism, as Hockney’s view is called, the world begins with monads, zero-dimensional points that have always existed and are so structured that they contain, in effect, all of mathematics:

Illuminism begins with the simplest possible thing – a single mathematical point. This is the monad, the basic unit of existence. Being unextended, it conforms with Descartes’ definition of a thinking mind…it contains all the numbers between zero and infinity in all directions, signs and orientations. These numbers exist in anextremely precise way, guaranteed to produce a net result of nothing so that the point is ultimately defined by the number zero, the inverse of which is infinity.(415-422).

Those with some background in philosophy will immediately see in the concept of monads the influence of Leibniz, whom Hockney greatly respects. In fact, Hockney traces the Illuminist movement back to Pythagoras, the great Greek philosopher and mathematician, through Liebniz and on to the present day, describing it as a mostly ignored view that has been handed down from generation to generation by a small group of adherents. Though the central underlying principle has remained constant—mathematically-based reason is the key to understanding ourselves and our world—the details of the view have been modified somewhat over the generations. Thus Hockney’s version of monads is somewhat different from Leibniz’s, and in particular, it is that last descriptive statement that Hockney claims resolves the something from nothing problem. As he goes on to expound:

In order for zero to be the inevitable and inescapable net result of the combination of infinite numbers, all of the numbers must conform with the most powerful analytic formula in the whole of mathematics – Euler’s Formula, the great jewel of mathematics: eix = cos x + i sin x…

What’s so remarkable about Euler’s Formula is that it produces perfect balance between negative and positive numbers, between real and imaginary numbers and between zero and infinity. No element is privileged over any other. The net ontological effect of theformula is zero (since the circle’s negative half perfectly cancels its positive half), yet this is an “infinite” zero, a structured “nothing” that goes on forever!…

In order to include all possible ontological numbers, it’s necessary to introduce a more generalized form of Euler’s Formula:

A e i( fx + ö) = A cos (fx + ö) + i A sin (fx + ö)

where A is amplitude, f is frequency and ö = the phase angle (phase shift). In the frequency domain, the three elements necessary to specify a wave are amplitude, frequency and phase, so this generalized formula allows all possible waves to be accommodated. (426-450)

Bringing in waves is essential to Hockney’s view of how monads create the phenomenal world, which I will discuss later. But for now, let’s return to the something from nothing issue.

A “simple” point is therefore nothing of the kind. It’s an infinite information system, based on a superposition of infinite waves of every conceivable permutation, all of which put together produce a sum of zero (total and infallible balancing to zero).

Simply by defining a wave as the mathematical basis and definition of energy, a point is transformed into a repository of infinite, balanced energy. And bear in mind that this energy is necessarily eternal. Euler’s circle never stops spinning. Nothing can ever halt it – because ultimately there’s nothing there! An Euler circle is simply an ingeniously ordered and structured nothingness that can never perish. It’s always rotating and can never stop. Energy is just eternal motion.(451-458)

The foundational, uncaused causes of reality must be mathematical and they must have the property of being “nothing” since nothing is the compulsory rational ground state of existence. Mathematics has the ultimate rational trick up its sleeve – because “nothing” can also be something. It’s precisely because something and nothing can be equated (via an equation as simple as, for example, 2 – 1 – 1 = 0) that we are all here at all; that anything is here.(579-582).

What is “nothing”? It’s categorically not “non-existence”. Nothing is actually something. Something is mathematically structured nothingness. The generalised Euler Formula is exactly the miraculous mathematical instrument that allows nothing to be structured.(996-998)

So the Illuminist solution to the problem of “something from nothing” is to equate the two. Nothing, properly understood, is “ingeniously ordered and structured”, creating “an infinite information system, based on a superposition of infinite waves of every conceivable permutation, all of which put together produce a sum of zero”.

It’s not Sufficient to be Sufficient

In assessing this view, the first thing to emphasize is that this is simply a postulate, no different in principle from the assumption of universal scientific laws. How does Hockney know that this Euler-based system exists? The short answer is that he believes this is the only reasonable scenario:

Since it has only one element, the Euler universe is in best accord with Occam’sRazor. There’s nothing outside it. It explains everything. It leaves no gaps, hence obeys Leibniz’s principle of continuity. It’s the basis of Leibniz’s principle of sufficient reason, and of all causality. It enshrines all of Plato’s immutable, eternal laws (considered mathematically).(4556-4560)

Leibniz’s principle of sufficient reason, which says everything happens for a reason, is especially important to Hockney, who uses it in two ways: 1) to demonstrate that the scientific worldview does not follow this principle, in that no sufficient reason can be given for why there are particular scientific laws rather than others, why that which is observed through the senses should be regarded as real, and so on; and 2) to show that a sufficient reason can be given for the existence of the monads:

Via [Euler’s] formula, existence can be maintained at its necessary groundstate of zero (nothing), while always being something. (Any non-zero resultant cosmic energy is forbidden. There is no sufficient reason why the cosmos should have any arbitrary energy, and why such an energy should be above the ground state.)(441-444)

If one monad can exist with no net energy, what sufficient reason could prevent the existence of others, also with zero net energy? In fact, what could prevent the existence of infinite such “nothings”?(465-467)

The first law of thermodynamics (stating that energy can be neither created nor destroyed) is, rationally, a statement that the energy of the universe is always zero (because there could never be a sufficient reason for the energy to be greater than zero, and if the energy of the universe is always zero then it automatically follows that there can’t be any more or less of it).(588-591)

I think Hockney is at his best here, arguing against the apparent arbitrariness of the conventional scientific view of energy. Another, even better, example of this arbitrariness is found in the fundamental constants or parameters of the universe, which have to be set within very narrow limits for the universe to exist. No one understands why this is the case, and the fact that this is so upsetting to most scientists and other theorists is basically a validation of Leibniz’s principle. We believe there should be a reason for why things are the way they are. Einstein famously objected to the notion of a universe based on a roll of the dice.

Read full article here…

Comments 294

  1. Pingback: writeessay

  2. Pingback: best canadian mail order pharmacies

  3. Pingback: where can i buy levitra in uk

  4. Pingback: cialis orders paypal paid

  5. Pingback: pharmacy online viagra

  6. Pingback: cialis for sale

  7. Pingback: when will there be a generic cialis

  8. Pingback: viagra scams on the internet

  9. Pingback: senior viagra erections

  10. Pingback: buy cialis now

  11. Pingback: order original cialis online

  12. Pingback: buy cialis cheap canada

  13. Pingback: celebrex without persciption

  14. Pingback: cialis without prescriptions canada

  15. Pingback: generic cialis canadian

  16. Pingback: cialis without presciption in usa

  17. Pingback: canada cialis online

  18. Pingback: how to stop cymbalta 20mg

  19. Pingback: can i buy cialis in toronto

  20. Pingback: cialis online daily

  21. Pingback: buy cialis now

  22. Pingback: buy cialis in miami

  23. Pingback: buy cialis philippines

  24. Pingback: sophia viagra no makeup

  25. Pingback: cialis 20mg low price

  26. Pingback: buy cialis now

  27. Pingback: real viagra sex

  28. Pingback: cialis professional

  29. Pingback: jodi west viagra

  30. Pingback: online pharmacy viagra

  31. Pingback: cialis for sale

  32. Pingback: levitra 20 mg

  33. Pingback: discount viagra

  34. Pingback: cialis cost

  35. Pingback: incest viagra

  36. Pingback: cialis otc

  37. Pingback: viagra patent

  38. Pingback: how much is viagra

  39. Pingback: natural viagra for men

  40. Pingback: cialis reviews by men

  41. Pingback: viagra or cialis

  42. Pingback: coupons for viagra

  43. Pingback: viagra and blindness report 2017

  44. Pingback: viagra sex party

  45. Pingback: generic viagra without the prescription

  46. Pingback: is viagra federally funded

  47. Pingback: viagra commercial girl

  48. Pingback: viagra model kathy king nude

  49. Pingback: girl on female viagra

  50. Pingback: viagra time to work

  51. Pingback: couple cialis

  52. Pingback: best viagra retailer

  53. Pingback: otc viagra 2018

  54. Pingback: sildenafil precio walmart

  55. Pingback: viagra online donde comprar

  56. Pingback: 100mg cialis for sale

  57. Pingback: sildenafil 50 mg cost

  58. Pingback: fish mox vs amoxicillin

  59. Pingback: amoxicillin dosage for sinus infection

  60. Pingback: azithromycin tablet

  61. Pingback: celecoxib 200 mg capsule

  62. Pingback: does keflex contain penicillin

  63. Pingback: shell fish allergy and cephalexin

  64. Pingback: cymbalta overdose

  65. Pingback: buy viagra worldwide

  66. Pingback: cialis actress australia

  67. Pingback: viagra 50 coupon

  68. Pingback: otc cialis 2018

  69. Pingback: mom help son viagra problem jody west

  70. Pingback: buy cialis online mexico

  71. Pingback: buy tadalafil0 with pay pal

  72. Pingback: where can i buy without a prescription

  73. Pingback: cheapest retin a

  74. Pingback: payday loan yes newark

  75. Pingback: woman on viagra commercial

  76. Pingback: 20mg for sale

  77. Pingback: cialis bestellen

  78. Pingback: köpä cialis

  79. Pingback: buy ativan in pakistan

  80. Pingback: buy cialis toronto

  81. Pingback: canadian pharmacy east bay largo fl

  82. Pingback: fake cialis side effects

  83. Pingback: sending prescription drugs through mail

  84. Pingback: does rx pharmacy coupons work

  85. Pingback: trial pack cialis viagra levitro

  86. Pingback: 20mg cialis daily

  87. Pingback: viagra insurance

  88. Pingback: tadalafil generic date

  89. Pingback: women viagra pills

  90. Pingback: generic cialis cheap

  91. Pingback: citrate sildenafil

  92. Pingback: neurontin dosage

  93. Pingback: clonidine dosing for anxiety

  94. Pingback: finasteride uses

  95. Pingback: carvedilol moa

  96. Pingback: metronidazole gel

  97. Pingback: cialis 40mg generic

  98. Pingback: sildenafil 100 mg

  99. Pingback: levitra dose

  100. Pingback: acyclovir cream 50mg

  101. Pingback: omnicef

  102. Pingback: tadalafil liquid review

  103. Pingback: tadalafil 5mg tablets price

  104. Pingback: levitra drugstore

  105. Pingback: levitra over counter

  106. Pingback: naltrexone medication pdf

  107. Pingback: valacyclovir hcl 1gm tablet

  108. Pingback: tizanidine medication classification

  109. Pingback: tadalafil price walmart

  110. Pingback: cipro antibiotic wiki

  111. Pingback: generic cialis reviews

  112. Pingback: cialis forum

  113. Pingback: viagra and blood pressure

  114. Pingback: bernie sanders canada drugs

  115. Pingback: taking viagra and cialis together

  116. Pingback: fucking on viagra

  117. Pingback: the drug store pharmacy columbus ohio

  118. Pingback: pharmacy technician in canada

  119. Pingback:

  120. Pingback: how to make natural viagra with immediate effect!

  121. Pingback: losartan potassium hydrochlorothiazide side effects

  122. Pingback: amlodipine what is it used for

  123. Pingback: is lipitor a blood thinner

  124. Pingback: phentermine and prozac

  125. Pingback: how long can you safely take prilosec

  126. Pingback: side effects of quetiapine 200 mg

  127. Pingback: zoloft and tylenol

  128. Pingback: boost mobile cards at walgreens

  129. Pingback: escitalopram come in an elixir

  130. Pingback: enalapril hydrochlorothiazide

  131. Pingback: best time to take atorvastatin 40 mg

  132. Pingback: lexapro withdrawal symptoms list

  133. Pingback: duloxetine patient assistance program

  134. Pingback: 1

  135. Pingback: amox clav 875 for uti

  136. Pingback: order propecia online india

  137. Pingback: buy prednisone 20mg online

  138. Pingback: tadalafil black

  139. Pingback: ivermectin cas

  140. Pingback: cialis 5mg uk

  141. Pingback: 1 ivermectin

  142. Pingback: buy stromectol online paypal

  143. Pingback: ivermectin side effects

  144. Pingback: cost of zithramax at cvs

  145. Pingback: ivermectin pour on for goats

  146. Pingback: ivermectin side effects dogs

  147. Pingback: generic name for ventolin

  148. Pingback: ivermectin pediatric dose

  149. Pingback: petsmart ivermectin

  150. Pingback: ivermectin dose for humans

  151. Pingback: agri mectin ivermectin

  152. Pingback: buy zithromax liquid online

  153. Pingback: exercising while on lisinopril

  154. Pingback: dapoxetine sildenafil review

  155. Pingback: ivermectina 6mg

  156. Pingback: cialis rxlist

  157. Pingback: cheap clomid

  158. Pingback: azithromycin for chlamydia over the counter

  159. Pingback: ivermectin uses

  160. Pingback: what parasites does ivermectin kill in humans

  161. Pingback: azithromycin over the counter usa

  162. Pingback: viagra 50mg price canada

  163. Pingback: sildenafil pills from mexico

  164. Pingback: pharmacies in canada shipping to usa

  165. Pingback: amoxicillin pneumonia

  166. Pingback: furosemide generic

  167. Pingback: drug neurontin 20 mg

  168. Pingback: quineprox 30

  169. Pingback: prednisone pill 20 mg

  170. Pingback: dapoxetine 30mg 1mg

  171. Pingback: modafinil drug

  172. Pingback: stromectol ebay

  173. Pingback: chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for sale

  174. Pingback: ventolin prices

  175. Pingback: zithromax purchase

  176. Pingback: buy gabapentin uk

  177. Pingback: otc stromectol for sale

  178. Pingback: prednisone 54

  179. Pingback: avana online

  180. Pingback: cialis half life

  181. Pingback: buy ivermectin nz

  182. Pingback: generic tadalafil 10mg

  183. Pingback: substitute for cialis

  184. Pingback: viagra sales usa

  185. Pingback: woman viagra over the counter

  186. Pingback: ivermectin lotion for lice

  187. Pingback: cialis patent expired

  188. Pingback: azithromycin antibiotic class

  189. Pingback: buy viagra cheap

  190. Pingback: what is more effective

  191. Pingback: viagra no script

  192. Pingback: what is cialis taken for

  193. Pingback: female viagra prank

  194. Pingback: viagra essential oil

  195. Pingback: viagra blood pressure

  196. Pingback: stromectol tablets 3 mg

  197. Pingback: generic cialis 5mg

  198. Pingback: online clomid

  199. Pingback: molnupiravir france

  200. Pingback: lumigan dosage

  201. Pingback: nolvadex sale

  202. Pingback: zanaflex sleep

  203. Pingback: zanaflex 40 mg

  204. Pingback: Anonymous

  205. Pingback: lilly baricitinib

  206. Pingback: do you have to have a prescription for sildenafil?

  207. Pingback: Anonymous

  208. Pingback: Anonymous

  209. Pingback: ivermectin tablets

  210. Pingback: ivermectin buy

  211. Pingback: where to purchase ivermectin

  212. Pingback: ignition casino update

  213. Pingback: where can i get ivermectin

  214. Pingback: ivermectin tablets for humans

  215. Pingback: order prednisone 20mg for sale

  216. Pingback: generic cialis singapore

  217. Pingback: tadalafil walgreens

  218. Pingback: ivermectin oral

  219. Pingback: stromectol over the counter

  220. Pingback: cheap genuine viagra uk

  221. Pingback: tadalafila

  222. Pingback: natural viagra for men

  223. Pingback: use of ivermectin

  224. Pingback: tadalafil dosage

  225. Pingback: buy cialis usa pharmacy

  226. Pingback: tadalafil 5mg

  227. Pingback: sildenafil tablets for sale

  228. Pingback: tadalafil online

  229. Pingback: roman tadalafil

  230. Pingback: ivermectin 1 topical cream

  231. Pingback: sildenafil pills online purchase

  232. Pingback: generic sildenafil tablets

  233. Pingback: cialis without a doctor prescription

  234. Pingback: when will cialis be generic

  235. Pingback: tadalafil prescription cost

  236. Pingback: buy cialis online in india

  237. Pingback: how to order prednisone online

  238. Pingback: prednisone 20mg for eczema

  239. Pingback: molnupiravir fact sheet for patients

  240. Pingback: cialis online prescription usa

  241. Pingback: cialis over the counter singapore

  242. Pingback: where to buy cialis in australia

  243. Pingback: ivermectin solubility

  244. Pingback: prednisone side effects in women

  245. Pingback: how long does viagra last

  246. Pingback: buy tadalafil online

  247. Pingback: $100 no deposit usa casinos

  248. Pingback: cialis online

  249. Pingback: stromectol pills

  250. Pingback: ivermectin paste for humans

  251. Pingback: usa casinos no deposit free welcome bonus

  252. Pingback: cialis cost 20mg

  253. Pingback: cost for generic viagra

  254. Pingback: cialis dosis

  255. Pingback: ivermectin dosierung

  256. Pingback: cialis from canada no prescription

  257. Pingback: uttar pradesh ivermectin

  258. Pingback: how to get cialis prescription online

  259. Pingback: stromectol coronavirus

  260. Pingback: ciprofloxacin convert

  261. Pingback: ivermectin cream 5

  262. Pingback: azithromycin strength

  263. Pingback: zithromax iv

  264. Pingback: generic cialis tadalafil

  265. Pingback: cephalexin dogs

  266. Pingback: azithromycin sibo

  267. Pingback: cephalexin other

  268. Pingback: ivermectin 3mg

  269. Pingback: furosemide 40 mg tablet uk

  270. Pingback: buy cheap lasix without prescription

  271. Pingback: ivermectin gel

  272. Pingback: ivermectin for horses

  273. Pingback: tadalafil and dapoxetine

  274. Pingback: ivermectin 4000 mcg

  275. Pingback: ivermectin protocol

  276. Pingback: ivermectin for covid

  277. Pingback: stromectol ivermectinst

  278. Pingback: sign in

  279. Pingback: ivermectin 8000

  280. Pingback: stromectol to buy

  281. Pingback: ivermectin tablet price

  282. Pingback: ivermectin cream 1%

  283. Pingback: ivermectin 4

  284. Pingback: ivermectin pills

  285. Pingback: ivermectin lotion price

  286. Pingback: ivermectin 4 tablets price

  287. Pingback: tadalafil cialis

  288. Pingback: order ivermectin for humans

  289. Pingback: ivermectin lotion

  290. Pingback: ivermectin japan

  291. Pingback: ivermectine usa

  292. Pingback: ivermectin structure

  293. Pingback: viagra

  294. Pingback: revatio

Leave a Reply